Sunday, August 31, 2014

Source: http://feedinghk.org/

Hong Kong is a city that loves to eat. Unfortunately, we’re also a city prone to waste.
Over 3,200 tonnes of food waste is produced in Hong Kong each day. The amount produced by the hospitality industry alone has doubled in the last 5 years. The vast majority of this food ends up in landfil

as food rots in landfill, it releases significant quantities of methane and carbon dioxide Green house gases

Globally, one-third of the food produced for human consumption is lost

greenhouse gas emissions come from growing food that is never eaten 10% of developed countries

IGCSE Global Perspectives Grade Percentages

Case Project
Group Project

30% IGCSE
2x20% Essay (2000 words)
30% Exam

Choose a project:Consider audience, school fia,r house charity, house charity week, assembly, schoool charities

Make a performance, video, photo collage, etc

Monday, August 25, 2014

Leadership Qualities Question Answers

Which pieces of the pie are largest? Which are smallest?
-There is only one piece of pie

Are there any pieces particularly bigger than others?
-No

What are your strengths?
-Filming, film editing, digital posters, team carry, independant

What are your weaknesses?
-Researching, essays, teamwork

Do you appreciate teachers who lead the classroom with an autocratic,
democratic or empowering style?
-Autocratic because therefore the lesson can run smoothly with out argument or disruptions

Can you think of an example of each style?
-Autocratic:Mrs Ma
-Democratic:Mr Irwin
-Empowering: Mrs Vittachi

Give an example of a leader who used a particular style when another might have
been more appropriate.
-Mrs Vittachi uses an empowering style to her teaching however I feel that a Autocratic style is more appropriate

Which style feels most comfortable when you lead?
-Autocratic

Which are you most comfortable when you follow?
-Autocratic

What impact do you think culture has on leadership style?
-I don't know

What type of leader will you be?
-Mostly likely democratic

What are your strength areas?
-Above

What are your growth areas?
-Working as a team



Sunday, March 23, 2014

climate change: Who's the blame?

Introduction (animation)­

So let’s start off with what is global warming?

Global warming is basically an increase in the world’s average temperature

which then leads to many kinds of climate changes around the globe

For example,

Increased chances of droughts or floods that appear occur in Bangladesh that stop people from growing crops and other things

Lots of species of animals are now also at the risk of being extinct

More extreme weathers are occurring in many places which can cause forest fires, tornadoes, and extremely cold weathers to occur in those places.

But how does global warming all work?


Well we’ll start off with the sun’s radiation absorbed in to the earth.

The radiation then either gets reflected back in to space

Or because of the greenhouse gases we produce, the radiation gets trapped inside earth

All this radiation then gets collected up and causes the earth to start warming up.

This whole process is called global warming,

but what is causing the greenhouse gases?

we’ll many things contribute to global warming as a whole

plants, volcanoes, natural waste, cows, sheep’s, and other things

But those only contribute a tiny amount global warming, the majority of greenhouse gases come from us using

cars, factories, trains, buses, boats, planes etc.





 First part (video)

The blame for climate change can be viewed in a few ways, by individuals *human silhouette*, by countries *country silhouette* or by nature *volcano silhouette*.

First let’s look at how we individuals contribute to global warming.

There are two ways us as individuals contribute to global warming. The direct way, and the indirect way.

The direct way contribute to global warming everyday simply by using things like (full screen images) light bulbs, showers, fridges, phones, laptops, TV, air conditioners, heaters, cars, buses, elevators, escalators, etc.

and it’s because all these things we use require fuel such as electricity and gasoline which in order to make, majority of the time would be done by burning fossil fuels which ends up producing carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

In fact in 2003 the average carbon footprint per household is around 12.4 tons.

The indirect way we contribute to global warming is by buying new products which has been manufactured by factories.

Each product that we buy has used a substantial amount of energy to make in which the consequence is the greenhouse gases produced by making the product.

Another way we contribute the global warming is by waste. For all the waste that we end up disposing, that end up being processed before going to landfills and that process can produce lots of carbon emissions.

In 2003 the average amount of indirect carbon footprint per household is around 35 tons which is over 2.5 times more of our direct carbon footprint which is why the industrial factories produce so much more greenhouse gases than we do.

This makes the total Carbon footprint per household in 2003 including our indirect emissions to a grand total of around 50 tons per year.

Okay now let’s looks statistically at which country has the most carbon emissions per person.

In 2003 the EIA *EIA (energy information administration international energy annual)* collected data from each country then made a graph showing which countries emits the most carbon dioxide per capita.

As the graph shows, the United States emit the greatest amount of carbon in 2003. Even though America is only 4.4% of the world’s population, they are responsible for almost 25% of the total carbon emissions and with around 20 tons is over 6 times the global average of 3 tons.

Another thing we can see from the graph is although many think that china is the biggest source of pollution,

you can see that they are under the world average and nowhere near the one of the top emitters of greenhouse gases

per capita that is


Second part (video)

In a global scale the blame for climate change is a little bit more complicated. Many people think that pollution comes from the factories in China and although that may be true, you can’t entirely blame china but instead the consumerism culture around the world.

China’s factories are just a small part behind a much bigger picture.

Third part (animation)

Let’s start off with the consumerism culture. In 1970 the consumerism was used as a term of where the social order and ideology of consumerism *consumerism* encourages us to purchase goods *newer and newer generation of things* and replacing our old ones even to the point where our old products function almost as if they were brand new yet we still replace them with newer ones. *iphone 4 and 5*.

Now this consumerism has brought a completely new problem to our world in two ways, the first is to our earth’s resources which are disappearing faster and faster with the higher demand of new products.
The second way is what we have now which is a climate change problem. With higher demands for goods, America and other places around the globe has completely shifted the weight on to china where they can build factories for very low prices *factories appearing from America moving to china*. This then causes lots of carbon emissions.
Then here’s where America and the other places gets bitten back in the tail.
Pollution gets shifted to the consumerism places; they now have all the pollution in their country however they blame China for all the pollution even though they are the main reason for the pollution in the first place.

End/Final part

so back to the question. Who is to blame?

Well no matter how you think of who is to blame for climate change, there is no real ONE certain kind of people or ONE certain country to blame.

In other words if you want to blame anyone in the world for climate change, its EVERYONE

because one way or another we have all contributed to emitting greenhouse gases, and buying in to the consumerism culture and this is our fault and not for China or any of the companies making the money to take the fall for.
so next time you take a shower for over an hour because you just have nothing to do
Or keep your TV on while you’re gaming and clearly not focusing on the TV
Or Buying the iphone 5s when you know it’s basically the same thing as the iphone 5

Just remember, this is our world, and it is our responsibility to take care of it
And a final quote, we do not inherit from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.








Sources:

 "Report 5: How Do We Contribute to Global Warming?" Report 5: How Do We Contribute to Global Warming? N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

"The Age Of Stupid - Consumerism." YouTube. YouTube, 06 Feb. 2011. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

"Consumerism." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 15 Mar. 2014. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

"How Big Is One Ton of Carbon?" The Green Economy. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

"Global Carbon Emissions Rise to New Record in 2013." Scientific American Global RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

"SRI-RTP." » Blog Archive » Which Countries Produce The Most Green House Gases. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.


"Climate Change and Global Warming Introduction." - Global Issues. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.





Sunday, November 24, 2013

To what extent can poverty be seen a priority government issue across the globe?

Poverty is one of the major global issues. Living in poverty is living in the lowest quality of life and lacking human necessities such as food, water, shelter, healthcare and education. Around 80% of the world’s population live on fewer than 2.5 U.S dollars a day, 20% living in extreme poverty and around 22,000 children are dying daily due to poverty. Many organizations such as The United Nations and The World Bank are slowly helping poverty decrease around the world, but without properly addressing poverty as a global issue there will not be enough help to stop poverty around the world.

This essay will address the issue about the government and public’s awareness of how much of an existing problem it actually is around the world, the aim is to achieve an idea of how much does the really put in to helping those in poverty and how aware are the general public of the current issue. 
Governments are often criticized about how they manage their money and what they spend it on. It is a well known fact that every countries Government spends the most of their money on military but how much do they spend on helping the people in their own country in need? and 


Hong Kong is a very populated and wealthy city with the population density of 6544 people per square kilometer. Despite Hong Kong being a very wealthy city, there are currently around 1.3 million people living under poverty line. The "South China Morning Post" found that one out of every five children and one out of three of the elderly live below the poverty line. There are a few local charity organizations that are working to fight poverty.

"Feeding Hong Kong" is one of the few organizations that helps people in poverty. Their goal is to reduce wasted food from reaching landfills and finding a safe and reliable way to give this food to the people in need.

"Oxfam Hong Kong" is also an organization start in 1963 that helps people in poverty, not only in Hong Kong but around the world. They are an independent organization who aims to fight against poverty and the injustice in the economy.

Although there are a few organizations around Hong Kong helping to fight against poverty, the government had only recently started to try to tackle poverty. Only late September 2013 did the government set the Poverty Line of $3600 per month as starting point to fight poverty. Recently the Hong Kong government has set a minimum wage of $30 per hour. The "Federation of Trade Unions" had a plan of a subsidy of $400-$1600 for the people living under the poverty line based on their working hours.



In the US around 46.5 million people (15%) live under the governments poverty line but even after a year of government aids and other non-governmental aids to try stop poverty, the Census Bureau measured the number of people in poverty being the same as it was year ago. 

 In 2012 the all that the U.S government needed to spend is 175 billion dollars to raise everyone up to the poverty line however they are able to spend 700 billion dollars on military instead. This is four times what is needed to stop poverty.

“United Nations Development Program” is one of the many United Nations programs that help with poverty. Unlike Hong Kong, America has identified and have been trying to tackle poverty for quite a while already.







http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/06/us-usa-economy-poverty-idUSBRE9A513820131106                                                                                                                                                                    http://www.thenation.com/article/176242/americas-shameful-poverty-stats#

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1320690/sizing-poverty-hong-kong

http://feedinghk.org/about/our-mission/

http://hongwrong.com/hong-kong-population-density/

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1319984/hong-kong-draws-poverty-line-13-million-living-below-it?page=all

http://www.dosomething.org/tipsandtools/11-facts-about-global-poverty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty

http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/gaef3313.doc.htm